refers to the landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Here’s a brief overview:
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of your offense demands the most stringent punishment, taking into consideration the sanctity of human life and deterrence for possible offenders.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fire-arm injury which was fatal to the deceased was caused from the petitioner but in support of opinion in the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is available about the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is not binding around the Court.
maintaining the conviction awarded towards the appellant reduce the sentence of the appellant from imprisonment for life to at least one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts with the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to make it suitable towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue website of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice is often a mandatory prerequisite as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law calls for that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
In almost any society, the enforcement of legislation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. One of the most significant crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 from the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is essential to make certain justice prevails.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, such as eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature from the seized currency.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected towards the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
Case legislation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is essential for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to those resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and promoting transparency.
In order to prove murder, there must be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually well established now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar towards the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may well if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service for the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these types of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of fork out and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and identified experts to review and rule on foreseeable future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.